EFFECTIVE ASEPTIC MATERIAL TRANSFER = LESS QUALITY
FAILURES
A SILICONE-BASED ASEPTIC SAMPLING, INOCULATION AND TRANSFER SYSTEM FOR
CONTAMINATION CONTROL IN PHARMACEUTICAL PROCESSING HAS BEEN RECENTLY
INTRODUCED.
Your pilot-scale bioreactor is in full process with the
recombinant protein project of an important new client. The specialized media
ingredients were expensive. Gradually, the rate of base addition creeps beyond
the rate you expect and your suspicions are aroused. You pull a sample and
examination under a microscope confirms your fear - a strange microbe has found
its way into the process and has taken over. All you can do is kill the broth
and flush it into the waste system, losing the amount of time and materials in
which youve invested. Then you start the process all over again.
This scenario is a nightmare for a bioprocessing pilot plant operator - a
situation operators take tedious steps to avoid. Operators follow an integrated
quality control programme that begins well before the first vial of inoculum is
opened and continues until the product is delivered and accepted.
INDIVIDUAL STEPS TO QUALITY
Standard quality control systems are followed in all competent pilot plant
operations. But its not the entire systematic process that helps ensure
quality. It is the individual steps that make up the programme that matter. One
of the most important steps in any quality programme is the aseptic transfer of
small volume or low flow rate materials into the bioreactor while the process is
in progress. Yet, quite often, plant operators have not taken the time to truly
understand why this step is so important. Quality Management, Inc., (QMI) has
built an international business based on the importance of this one step in the
quality process.
Based in St. Paul, Minnesota, QMI is a manufacturer of products and product
systems that help ensure aseptic transfer and inoculation during
microprocessing. Founded by the author, a microbiologist, QMI originally
manufactured and marketed aseptic transfer and inoculation systems for the food
processing (particularly the dairy) industry. Food processing companies
throughout the world have used the staple QMI product, a single-needle port made
up of non-coring rubber or silicone, protected by a metal base. Users of the QMI
product in the food processing industry include Yoplait Yogurt, Dannon and
Nestles.
SAFE SEPTUM
In 1993, QMI designed transfer and inoculation products specifically for
microprocessing and pharmaceutical applications, as well as for the brewing and
distilling industry. The product, which was named the Safe-Septum, was
introduced to these industries in rubber and silicone-based options. The Safe
Septum is now in use at such microprocessing facilities as Lifecore Biomedical
and the Biological Process Technology Institute at the University of
Minnesota.
Aseptic materials transferred into the bioreactor vessel during a process run
include acid and base for pH control, anti-foam agents, nutrient solutions,
chemical solutions for biotransformation or as a part of the process, and gases.
Cultured inoculum transfer obviously must be done with the same care as any of
the other sterile processes. Samples of the materials in process must also be
drawn out of the bioreactor with the same level of attention to avoid
contamination.
CONFIGURING LARGE VOLUME TRANSFER SYSTEMS
The transfer of these materials and the appropriate transfer system varies
according to the volume of material and flow rate necessary. Aseptic materials
required in large volumes, for example a filter-sterilised nutrient solution,
are usually moved in sanitary lines that are sterilised in place and used once.
Configuration of large volume transfer systems for sterile or pure culture
materials into and out of bioreactors receives significant attention during
equipment and process design.
Widely accepted systems of sterilisation that plant operators have used for
years include the stream-in-place method, sanitary couplings - the materials
needed for fixed or flexible lines - and pumps for moving large volumes. When
these systems are operated according to manufacturers suggested procedures,
their performance can be monitored. They typically work well and allow for the
aseptic transfer of large volumes into and out of bioreactors during process
operation.
Materials that are required in small volumes or at low flow rates can be
transferred using small lines that may be connected using an aseptic technique
after the bioreactor vessel is sterile and/or while the process is running.
These small volume addition ports, when properly designed and operated, have
also become standardised in the industry.
Surprisingly, the techniques for transferring small volume or low flow rate
materials are given little attention by plant operators. Although the transfer
must be quick and efficient, it must also be completed using the latest
technologies to help ensure the method is aseptic. The latest technology is
aseptic transfer of small or low flow rate materials with bioreactor processing
is the QMI Safe-Septum.
UNDERSTANDING YOUR OPTIONS
Currently, the three most commonly used configurations in pilot-scale
bioreactor facilities are miniature sanitary couplings, spring-loaded
quick-connect fittings, and septum/needle combinations.
Sanitary fittings
Many pilot plant operators prefer the miniature sanitary fitting because it
looks like larger manufacturing systems. Yet this configuration is probably the
least convenient type of fitting to connect while a process is running. An
operator must open a sterile port with one of these fittings while keeping a
gasket in place, positioning the mating sterile connector, and clamping the
connection together. Even the extremely cautious (and coordinated) technician
has trouble avoiding the contamination of surfaces that come in contact with the
process liquids being added or removed. This configuration, which has to be
steam-sterilised after the connection is made, is dangerous. The tortuous path
of material flow and construction of the addition vessel being attached may not
allow for adequate sterilisation of the connection area. Small sanitary fittings
are most appropriate when the connection is made before the process vessel is
sterilised. The connection can then be sterilised along with the rest of the
process equipment and reliable aseptic transfer of materials can be
accomplished.
Quick-connects
A more convenient configuration is that of the spring-loaded quick-connect
fittings. An aseptic connection is made when the female connector is attached to
the addition vessel and the male connector is configured on the bioreactor
vessel to be covered and independently sterilised. The sterilisation of the male
connector is especially useful if more than one connection must be made to a
single addition port during the process run. Yet, when using the
quick-connections, you must plan ahead. The need for an additional port may
arise and be unforeseen. If you are out of ports, your process may be over
before your product is complete.
Septum/needle systems
Many plant operators consider the septum/needle combination method to be the
most convenient and the lowest cost option. In the past, fresh rubber septums
were installed for every run and they were sterilised with the wipe of an
appropriate sanitising agent. When they were penetrated with a sterile needle,
most operators assumed the transaction was as aseptic as it could possibly
be.
Because of the QMI Safe-Septum, the older septum/needle systems have become
antiquated, especially when you consider the increasingly stringent quality
requirements of modern bioprocesses and the high cost of bioprocessing materials
and labour - all of which are compromised when older systems are used. Plant
operators have begun to recognise the shortcomings of the older systems, but
have relied on them anyway, even though they are risky, because of their low
cost and convenience. The author, in working with the Biological Process
Technology Institute at the University of Minnesota, also recognised the need to
refine this choice of aseptic transfer method so that quality requirements were
met, costs were kept low, and no materials or labour were lost because of failed
or contaminated processes.
The main sources of failure found with the older septum/needle designs are
surface contamination and the inability of the septum to reseal after every
puncture by a needle.
PRESSURES OF STEAM STERILIZATION
The older design requires support for the rubber to allow it to withstand the
pressures of steam sterilisation. The perforated metal used to support the
rubber septa creates the perfect hiding place for microbial contaminants,
protecting them both from the heat and the contact with the sanitising agent
used to sterilise the septum before it is penetrated with a needle. Thus,
contaminants can escape from the very things that are meant to kill them. This
means that the incoming needle may transfer live microbial contaminants into the
bioreactor vessel and lead to process failure.
The QMI Safe-Septum is designed to withstand vessel pressurisation without
the supplementary support. The only potentially non-sterile surface that comes
in contact with the needle during the transfer of material is a smooth polymer
sheet that is easily sanitised before it is pierced. Because the interior of the
septum cartridge is never opened, it remains sterile as packaged, and the
surface in contact with the bioreactor interior is sterilised along with the
rest of the interior surfaces at the beginning of the transaction.
The sealing problem with older septum designs is often caused by the coring
of the rubber materials resulting from the use of larger needles. After the
needle is removed from the penetrated septum, typically the hole it makes does
not reseal. The result can be messy bubbling of liquid on the exterior of the
vessel at this hole site, caused by positive pressure. Alternatively, the
rubbers failure to reseal can cause the outright transfer of contaminated plant
air into the vessel interior in a neutral or negatively pressurised vessel. The
hole does not reseal because the septum is made of a material that can be cored
out by the needle after one or multiple insertions. Because this material is
stretched in older designs, the hold tends to get larger.
PROBLEMS SOLVED
The Safe-Septum solves these two particular problems. The Safe-Septum is
available in an EPDM or silicone material, both of which do not easily core. The
Safe-Septum cartridge is installed in a compressed state so that when a needle
is removed from it, the sides of the penetration hole match perfectly for easier
scaling and they are pressed together because of the compression of the
originally installed material. Thus, the sides are forced together into a tight
seal. These seals hold up under pressures of up to 30 psi, according to the
testers of the Safe-Septum. After repeated needle penetration through the
multiple, single-track needle ports in each Safe-Septum cartridge, no visible
leakage occurs. Added insurance of the reduced risk of contamination comes from
the unique, patented single-track QMI design that not only guides needles into
yet-to-be-penetrated material, but allows the technician to see where he/she has
pierced the material previously and, therefore, select another spot for
insertion.
MINOR CHANGES CAN LEAD TO MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
As for many other industries, the pharmaceutical bioprocessing business is
experiencing shrinking resources and increasingly strict quality requirements.
Technicians must re-examine how theyve done things in the past and make minor
changes that lead to major improvements in how efficiently and cost effectively
they do their jobs. Learning about the latest products is the first step, and
integrating those products is the next step towards higher quality and lower
costs.
QMI (Quality Management, Inc.) 426 Hayward Avenue North
Oakdale Minnesota 55128
Ask for your complimentary copy of the Safe Septum Training Video on CD today. We'll even take care of the shipping cost.
Tel: 651-501-2337 Fax: 651-501-5797 Email: info@qmisystems.com *Manufactured under license from Galloway Co., Neenah, WI **QMI products are protected by the following U.S. Patents: 4,941,517; 5,086,813; 5,269,350,5,119,473